Use Built-in Panel Templates
Time: ~4 minutes
Learning outcome: Discover and use Council’s built-in templates for specialized deliberation scenarios.
What you’ll learn
Section titled “What you’ll learn”By the end of this tutorial, you will:
- List all available built-in templates
- Inspect template details to understand the expert panel composition
- Run a debate using a template
Prerequisites
Section titled “Prerequisites”- Completed Tutorial 1: Install and First Debate
- Familiarity with
council convene
What are templates?
Section titled “What are templates?”Templates are pre-configured expert panels designed for specific decision contexts. Each template includes:
- Curated experts with specific roles and perspectives
- Optimized system prompts tailored to the scenario
- Sensible defaults for debate configuration
Templates are optional — Council can auto-compose a panel for any topic — but they provide consistency and expertise for common use cases.
Step 1: List available templates
Section titled “Step 1: List available templates”See all built-in templates:
council templatesYou’ll see output like:
Built-in templates (17):
Engineering: • architecture-review Multi-perspective review of architecture and engineering decisions • code-review Multi-perspective code review with separated concerns • incident-postmortem Blameless analysis of a production incident
Product & Design: • product-strategy-review Pressure-tests a product strategy or major bet • roadmap-prioritization Turns a noisy backlog into a defensible ranked roadmap • ux-review Reviews a user experience — a flow, screen, or redesign
Go-to-Market: • brand-positioning-review Pressure-tests a brand and positioning decision • enterprise-deal-review Reviews a high-stakes enterprise deal from five seats • growth-experiment-review Reviews a growth experiment before launch • negotiation-prep Prepares for a high-stakes negotiation • pricing-packaging-review Stress-tests a pricing and packaging decision
Finance, People, Legal & Executive: • executive-strategy-board-prep Prepares an executive team for a board meeting • fpna-budget-review Pressure-tests an annual or quarterly budget • hiring-decision-review Stress-tests a hiring decision before the offer • legal-risk-review Reviews a contract, launch, or risk decision
Startup & Career: • career-coaching Career-decision panel for engineers • startup-validation Stress-test a startup or product idea
Use with: council convene "<topic>" --panel <name>Step 2: Inspect a template
Section titled “Step 2: Inspect a template”Before using a template, inspect it to see the full expert panel composition:
council templates inspect architecture-reviewYou’ll see:
- Template name and description
- List of experts with roles and responsibilities
- Default configuration (max rounds, debate mode, etc.)
Example output:
Template: architecture-reviewDescription: Technical architecture decisions with cross-functional perspectives
Experts (4): • Alex Chen (CTO) Strategic technical vision, long-term system design, risk assessment
• Jordan Martinez (Staff Engineer) Implementation feasibility, technical debt, engineering velocity
• Sam Okafor (Site Reliability Engineer) Operational impact, scalability, observability, incident response
• Taylor Kim (Product Manager) User impact, business value, time-to-market, stakeholder alignment
Debate mode: panelMax rounds: 4Step 3: Run a template-based debate
Section titled “Step 3: Run a template-based debate”Use a template by passing the --template flag (or its shorter alias --panel):
council convene "Should we migrate from REST to GraphQL?" --template architecture-reviewOr using the shorter --panel alias:
council convene "Should we migrate from REST to GraphQL?" --panel architecture-reviewWhat happens:
- Council loads the
architecture-reviewtemplate - The CTO, Staff Engineer, SRE, and PM experts are instantiated with their specialized prompts
- The debate proceeds with perspectives tailored to architectural decisions
You’ll see output like:
✓ Panel assembled: 4 experts (architecture-review template) • Alex Chen (CTO) — claude-sonnet-4.5 • Jordan Martinez (Staff Engineer) — claude-sonnet-4.5 • Sam Okafor (Site Reliability Engineer) — claude-sonnet-4.5 • Taylor Kim (Product Manager) — claude-sonnet-4.5
━━━ Round 1 ━━━
[Alex Chen — CTO]GraphQL gives clients query flexibility, but we need to behonest about the operational cost...
[Sam Okafor — SRE]Alex is underselling the observability nightmare. With REST,every endpoint is a discrete trace. With GraphQL...When to use templates vs. auto-composition
Section titled “When to use templates vs. auto-composition”| Use auto-composition when… | Use templates when… |
|---|---|
| Exploring a new topic or question | You need consistent panel composition |
| You want Council to design the panel | The scenario is a known domain (e.g., code review) |
| The topic doesn’t fit a template | You’re running repeated debates on similar topics |
What you accomplished
Section titled “What you accomplished”- Listed all built-in templates
- Inspected a template’s expert panel configuration
- Ran a debate using a specialized template
Next steps
Section titled “Next steps”- Tutorial 4: Resume a Debate — Continue a prior debate or view its transcript
- Try other templates: Experiment with
startup-validation,code-review, orcareer-coaching - Customize templates: Once comfortable, explore creating custom panel definitions
Commands introduced
Section titled “Commands introduced”| Command | Purpose |
|---|---|
council templates | List all built-in panel templates |
council templates inspect | Show detailed template configuration |
council convene --template | Run debate with specified template |
council convene --panel | Shorter alias for --template |
Built-in template reference
Section titled “Built-in template reference”All 17 built-in panels organized by discipline:
Engineering
Section titled “Engineering”| Template | Use for… |
|---|---|
architecture-review | Multi-perspective review of architecture and engineering decisions |
code-review | Multi-perspective code review with separated concerns |
incident-postmortem | Blameless analysis of a production incident |
Product & Design
Section titled “Product & Design”| Template | Use for… |
|---|---|
product-strategy-review | Pressure-tests a product strategy or major bet |
roadmap-prioritization | Turns a noisy backlog into a defensible ranked roadmap |
ux-review | Reviews a user experience — a flow, screen, or redesign |
Go-to-Market
Section titled “Go-to-Market”| Template | Use for… |
|---|---|
brand-positioning-review | Pressure-tests a brand and positioning decision |
enterprise-deal-review | Reviews a high-stakes enterprise deal from five seats |
growth-experiment-review | Reviews a growth experiment before launch or before shipping the “winner” |
negotiation-prep | Prepares for a high-stakes negotiation from five seats |
pricing-packaging-review | Stress-tests a pricing and packaging decision |
Finance, People, Legal & Executive
Section titled “Finance, People, Legal & Executive”| Template | Use for… |
|---|---|
executive-strategy-board-prep | Prepares an executive team for a board meeting or major strategy decision |
fpna-budget-review | Pressure-tests an annual or quarterly budget (decision-support, not financial advice) |
hiring-decision-review | Stress-tests a hiring decision before the offer (decision-support, not professional HR advice) |
legal-risk-review | Reviews a contract, launch, or risk decision (decision-support, not legal advice) |
Startup & Career
Section titled “Startup & Career”| Template | Use for… |
|---|---|
career-coaching | Career-decision panel for engineers weighing IC vs. management or job changes |
startup-validation | Stress-test a startup or product idea |